Not sure your AI-built app
is safe to launch?
A senior technical review of your prototype, repo, architecture, deployment path, and production risks — with a clear recommendation for what to fix, rebuild, harden, or hand off.
Pricing: $1.5k–$3.5k, depending on complexity. Typically completed in a focused review window after access and context are provided.
- ArchitectureNeeds review
- Auth & permissionsHigh risk
- Data handlingNeeds review
- DeploymentNeeds review
- ObservabilityHigh risk
- TestingHigh risk
- DocumentationHigh risk
Illustrative · every audit is project-specific
Built fast, now need a senior read.
- You built an MVP with AI tools (Lovable, Bolt, Replit, v0, Cursor, Claude Code, Base44).
- You have a working demo but unclear technical risk.
- You need investor, customer, or internal confidence in what you built.
- Your agency needs help validating a client prototype.
- You are deciding whether to refactor, rebuild, or extend.
A focused, technical pass across the things that break first.
Module boundaries, naming, hidden coupling, AI-generated patterns that don’t scale.
Provider, session model, role boundaries, password / token handling, account lifecycle.
Schema, ownership boundaries, exposure points, retention assumptions.
Surface area, validation, error contracts, authorization at the API edge.
Prompt boundaries, guardrails, evaluation, timeouts, retries, cost-aware patterns.
Build pipeline, secrets handling, environment separation, rollback path.
Structured logs, error reporting, health signals, alerting baseline.
What’s covered, what should be, and what’s realistic for the stage.
Architecture notes, runbooks, env docs — can the next engineer own this?
Where the design needs review by legal, security, or domain specialists.
Real deliverables you can act on.
- Production-readiness scorecard
- Risk register
- Architecture notes
- Recommended next steps
- Refactor / rebuild / extend recommendation
- Optional sprint estimate
- Auth coupled to demo provider with no role modelHighIntroduce role-based access and session boundaries before pilot.
- API keys committed to client bundleHighMove secrets server-side; rotate keys; add env-scoped config.
- No environment separation between dev and prodMediumStand up staging env + deploy pipeline with environment-scoped secrets.
- AI calls lack timeouts, retries, or fallbackMediumWrap calls with guardrails, structured logging, and graceful degradation.
- No logging or error reporting in production pathMediumAdd structured logs and an error reporter before user traffic.
Final scope is set after a short call. Pricing reflects codebase complexity, integrations, and review depth.
Typically completed shortly after access and context are provided. We’ll confirm timing on the intro call.
Refactor, rebuild, extend — or pause. We’ll tell you what we’d do, with or without us doing the work.
Common questions.
Yes, ideally read access to the repo and any deployed environment. We can also work from a hosted demo plus a screen-share if access is limited. We sign an NDA on request.
Yes. We regularly review apps built in Lovable, Bolt, Replit, v0, Cursor, Claude Code, Base44, and similar tools — and apps from internal teams or freelancers.
Often, yes. The audit ends with a refactor / rebuild / extend recommendation. If a sprint or rebuild is the right next step, we can scope it. There’s no obligation to continue.
Yes — see the Healthcare & Clinical Research page. We bring HIPAA-aware patterns, GCP-aware documentation thinking, and audit-trail-minded architecture review.
No. The audit is technical engineering review and implementation guidance. It is not legal, regulatory, medical, or compliance-certification advice.
WR Dev Labs provides technical engineering review and implementation support. This is not legal, regulatory, medical, security-certification, or compliance-certification advice.
Ready for a senior technical read?
Tell us what you built. We’ll come back with a recommendation.